• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin
AIM Leader
  • Cover Story
  • Features
  • AIM News
  • Alumni News
  • Multimedia
  • Alumni Benefits
  • Life At AIM
  • Contact
  • Give
Select Page
Articles

Typology, Network Features, and Damage Response in Worldwide Urban Road Systems

by Alumni Relations Office

Research by: Jesus Felix B. Valenzuela, Erika Fille T. Legara, & Christopher P. Monterola

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Natural disasters cause massive loss of life and property when they occur. Annual death tolls and property losses from such disasters number in the thousands of lives and millions of dollars; in 2018 alone, 315 reported natural disasters affected 68.5 million people, caused 11,804 deaths, and US$ 132 million in economic losses. Losses from such disasters are prone to mount in the aftermath unless relief measures are promptly set in motion and much–needed supplies reach those affected. This is of concern, especially for urban and metropolitan areas, where relief goods and services rely partly on the local road network infrastructure. Thus, finding out the robustness (or lack thereof) of a city’s road network topology becomes a critical step in planning for disasters that may hit a city.

 

In this paper, we perform graph-theoretic vulnerability analyses of the road networks of world urban areas at two different points in time (2014 and 2019). In particular, we examine how the time accessibility of points on a city’s road network changes in response to progressive, disaster-induced network degradation. We find that, far from falling on a continuum, cities worldwide fall into a discrete number of families or clusters: “resilient” cities, comprising the majority in both sets, “vulnerable” cities, and outliers, for which more information are needed. Members of each cluster share a common vulnerability behavior in response to progressive damage. In addition, we find that two network characteristics, proxies for a city’s size and the complexity of its road network, are the strongest predictors of vulnerability.

 

Being one of the first large-scale analyses of city road networks worldwide using open data (OpenStreetMap), we contribute to vulnerability and resilience studies, which are traditionally dominated by single-city or few-city case studies. Thus, our work offers a vulnerability typology metric, a first of its kind, that classifies cities according to how their road networks are vulnerable to disaster-induced damage and degradation. By identifying commonalities in damage response behavior between cities of the same family, we can thus facilitate the adoption and diffusion of effective disaster mitigation and management strategies.

 

A network-based assessment of a city’s road infrastructure offers valuable insights and identifies systemic weaknesses that must be accounted for when planning for emergency relief.

 

Keywords: city road networks; complex network analysis; disaster vulnerability and resilience; clustering; typology

To cite this article:  Valenzuela, J. F., Legara, E.F., & Monterola, C. P. (2022). Typology, network features and damage response in worldwide urban road systems. PLoS ONE, 17(3), e0264546. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264546

To access this article: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264546

 

About the journal

PLOS ONE is an inclusive journal community working together to advance science for the benefit of society, now and in the future. Founded with the aim of accelerating the pace of scientific advancement and demonstrating its value, we believe all rigorous science needs to be published and discoverable, widely disseminated and freely accessible to all. The research we publish is multidisciplinary and, often, interdisciplinary. PLOS ONE accepts research in over two hundred subject areas across science, engineering, medicine, and the related social sciences and humanities.

 

Journal ranking

Chartered Association of Business Schools

Academic Journal Guide 2021

NA
Scimago Journal & Country Rank SJR h-index: 332
SJR 2020: 0.99
Scopus CiteScore 2020: 5.3
Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate) JCI 2020: 0.57

Impact factor: 3.240

Related Articles

Alumni Thought Leaders
April 24, 2026
Is your risk program a cost center or a strategic weapon?
Risk Management has been positioned as the defense – the guard rail, the brake pedal, the “necessary cost.” Howe...
by Alumni Relations Office
Alumni Thought Leaders
April 23, 2026
The AI Trust Paradox: Why We Judge AI Work Differently (and why so many of us feel the need to hide it)
Here is a question I have been sitting with. When you learn that a piece of work was produced with AI, does it change how much you...
by Alumni Relations Office
Alumni Thought Leaders
December 9, 2025
From Warehouses to Lobbies: What Makes Teams High-Performing Across Sectors
Last week in our leadership class, we read the C&S Wholesale Grocers case from Harvard. It’s a warehousing company, not exac...
by Alumni Relations Office
AIM Logo

Learn how business works in Asia with the people who practice it.

  • Cover Story
  • Multimedia
  • Features
  • Life at AIM
  • AIM News
  • Contact
  • Alumni News
  • Give
  • Alumni Benefits
Copyright © Asian Institute of Management 2026 | Privacy Policy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin