• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin
AIM Leader
  • Cover Story
  • Features
  • AIM News
  • Alumni News
  • Multimedia
  • Alumni Benefits
  • Life At AIM
  • Contact
  • Give
Select Page
Articles

Translating Sustainable Purchase Intention to Actual Action Through the Incorporation of Affecting Design Factors Among Products

by Alumni Relations Office

Research by: Ardvin Kester S. Ong, John Francis T. Diaz, Joseph Khyle Andrei L. Abella, Rae Joie N. Alayra, Benedict Christian R. Calimag, Brandon Chandler B. Callo, Zachary Audrick K. Tee, & Cesar Romeo V. Delos Reyes

 

Executive Summary

The growing interest in sustainable products presents a paradox in consumer behavior, where intentions to purchase eco-friendly items often fail to translate into actual buying actions—commonly referred to as the intention–behavior gap. Considering the current lacking studies on the synchronous assessment of practical, business-reflected, and purchasing action of consumers; alongside the theoretical grounding gap among related studies, the novelty of this study lies in the intertwined assessment of both theoretical and practical aspects of sustainable behavior among consumers. This gap is particularly evident in the Filipino market for low-cost, energy-efficient solutions such as electric hand fans, which offer both environmental benefits and practical utility in the country’s hot and humid climate. Although previous research has applied the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to predict sustainable purchase intentions, it typically overlooks the emotional and psychological factors that influence real-world purchasing decisions.

 

Addressing this research gap, this study extended TPB by incorporating affective product design elements—namely, aesthetic appeal, ergonomic comfort, and price fairness—and brand trust as key determinants of sustainable consumption. Employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) on data from 500 Filipino consumers collected purposively to reflect sustainable consumers of the country, the study revealed that while TPB constructs (attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control) significantly affected sustainable intention, brand trust emerged as the most influential predictor of actual purchase behavior, surpassing intention itself. Collectively, these findings validated a multidimensional approach to understanding sustainable behavior, where affective product responses, cognitive appraisals, and social influences converge to shape both intentions and actions. Brand trust emerged as a central mediating construct, linking emotional evaluations of product design to both purchase intention and actual behavior. This aligns with related studies that demonstrated that affective trust—defined as the emotional bond between consumers and a web vendor—significantly mediates the relationship between website design features and behavioral intentions. Affective trust and affective risk proved more predictive of e-commerce behavior than cognitive counterparts, underscoring the critical role of emotionally grounded trust in bridging intention–behavior gaps. Similarly, in the context of sustainable consumption, our data indicate that affective resonance with a brand’s design and message fosters a deeper sense of trust, which in turn drives both motivational commitment and behavioral follow-through.

 

By extending TPB to incorporate affective design and trust, this study established a more novel framework assessing sustainable purchase behavior through emotional, sensory, and ergonomics factors alongside the behavioral domains. Moreover, this study not only enhances theoretical understanding of sustainable consumer behavior but also suggests prioritizing emotionally resonant features, explicitly link design and pricing strategies to credibility, recognize availability as a crucial enabler of action, and reliable distribution – aiming to foster eco-conscious purchases. Design strategies that prioritize visual appeal and usability foster emotional satisfaction and deepen brand connection—especially among younger consumers who are highly responsive to engaging and well-designed products. Equally, clear and fair pricing enhances perceived value and reinforces consumer confidence, making transparent communication around product utility and sustainability efforts a critical part of pricing strategy. Specifically, product design teams should prioritize emotionally resonant features such as intuitive ergonomics, minimalist yet attractive aesthetics, and environmentally conscious materials. For instance, incorporating recycled components and emphasizing comfort in everyday use can build both functional satisfaction and symbolic alignment with consumer values, thereby strengthening brand trust. Regular user testing with target groups (e.g., Gen Z and Millennials) can help ensure that design enhancements resonate emotionally while maintaining affordability.

 

 

Keywords:  affective design, brand trust, marketing, sustainable purchase intention, theory of planned behavior

To cite this article: Ong, A. K. S., Diaz, J. F. T., Abella, J. K. A. L., Alayra, R. J. N., Calimag, B. C. R., Callo, B. C. B., Tee, Z. A. K., & Delos Reyes, C. R. V. (2025). Translating sustainable purchase intention to actual action through the incorporation of affecting design factors among products. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2583272

To access the article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2583272

 

About the Journal

COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT

https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/oabm20

 

Cogent Business & Management is a multidisciplinary Open Access Journal that strives for inclusivity and global reach. The broad scope of the Journal creates a perfect environment to foster connections between researchers across all areas of Business & Management research, from Operations Research to Corporate Governance and Accounting to Marketing.

 

Publisher Taylor & Francis Ltd
Review System Blind Review
Chartered Association of Business Schools Academic Journal Guide 2024 ABS 1
Scimago Journal & Country Rank h-index: 56 | SJR 2024: 0.596
Scopus CiteScore 2024: 4.9
Australian Business Deans Council Journal List Not Ranked
Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate) JCI 2024: 0.65

 

Related Articles

Alumni Thought Leaders
April 24, 2026
Is your risk program a cost center or a strategic weapon?
Risk Management has been positioned as the defense – the guard rail, the brake pedal, the “necessary cost.” Howe...
by Alumni Relations Office
Alumni Thought Leaders
April 23, 2026
The AI Trust Paradox: Why We Judge AI Work Differently (and why so many of us feel the need to hide it)
Here is a question I have been sitting with. When you learn that a piece of work was produced with AI, does it change how much you...
by Alumni Relations Office
Alumni Thought Leaders
December 9, 2025
From Warehouses to Lobbies: What Makes Teams High-Performing Across Sectors
Last week in our leadership class, we read the C&S Wholesale Grocers case from Harvard. It’s a warehousing company, not exac...
by Alumni Relations Office
AIM Logo

Learn how business works in Asia with the people who practice it.

  • Cover Story
  • Multimedia
  • Features
  • Life at AIM
  • AIM News
  • Contact
  • Alumni News
  • Give
  • Alumni Benefits
Copyright © Asian Institute of Management 2026 | Privacy Policy
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin